Introduction: This study investigates the Utilisation of antenatal care and its impact on maternal and infant health in Panruti Taluk, Tamil Nadu, India, from 2013 to 2017. Antenatal care is essential for monitoring pregnancy, detecting complications, and providing necessary health advice and preventive care. Aim and Objective: To investigate the pattern of antenatal registration, childbirth and death and causes of infant death in the General Hospital and Primary Health Centres of Panruti taluk, Tamil Nadu, India. Methodology: The primary data (questionnaire schedule) was distributed to the pregnant women for health check-ups falling in the age group of 15 to 38 years who came to one government hospitals (229) and 10 primary health centres (10X150=1500), totally (229+1500) 1729 samples were collected by scientifically tested random sampling procedure from this taluk and they were the respondents of this study. This data was entered into SPSS software, and Regression analysis was performed for the interpretation of this study. Findings: The findings highlight the importance of educational qualifications, present age, and types of houses in predicting antenatal care utilisation. Additionally, the study examines the relationship between haemoglobin levels and socio-economic conditions, miscarriage, and infant deaths. Results: The results show that occupation, educational qualifications, and community are associated with haemoglobin levels, while miscarriage is influenced by present age, age at marriage, and educational qualifications. Conclusion: The study concludes that socio-economic and demographic factors play a crucial role in maternal and infant health, haemoglobin levels, miscarriage rates, and infant deaths in Panruti Taluk.
Published in | Social Sciences (Volume 14, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ss.20251404.27 |
Page(s) | 459-472 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Antenatal Care, Maternal Health, Infant Health, Socio-Economic Factors, Demographic Factors, Panruti Taluk, Tamil Nadu, India
Sl. No. | Year/Name of the Hospital | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Melpattampakkam (PHC) | Nil | Nil | Ante partum Eclampsia (1) | Cardiac Arrest (1) | Sepsis (1) | 3 |
2 | Melkumaramangalam (PHC) | Nil | Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizure (1) | Nil | Nil | Nil | 1 |
3 | Oraiyur (PHC) | Cardiac arrest (1) | Encephalitis (1) | Nil | Nil | Nil | 2 |
4 | Keel Arungunam (PHC) | Nil | Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (1) | Nil | Nil | Nil | 1 |
5 | Nellikuppam (PHC) | Nil | Nil | Pulmonary Embolism (1) | Nil | PuperalSepsis (1) | 2 |
6 | Kadampuliyur (PHC) | Nil | Nil | Disseminated Intra Vascular Coagulation (1), PPH (1) | Cardiac Arrest (2) | Nil | 4 |
7 | Marungur (PHC) | Septic Abortion (1) | Nil | PPH (1) | Nil | Nil | 2 |
8 | Perperiyankuppam (PHC) | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 0 |
9 | Veeraperumalnallur (PHC) | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nosocomical Sepsis | 1 |
10 | Panruti (PHC) | Nil | Dengue Shock Syndrome (1) | Nil | Disseminated Intra Vascular Coagulation (1) | Cardiac Arrest Secondary to sepsis (1) | 3 |
11 | Panruti (GH) | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Others (1) | 1 |
Total | 20 |
Year/Name of the Hospital | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Melpattampakkam (PHC) | Others 7 | Asphyxia 2, Sepsis 1, Pneumonia 1, Others 2 | Asphyxia 1, Others 2 | sepsis 1, Others 2 | Asphyxia 2, Others 1 | 22 |
Melkumaramangalam (PHC) | Asphyxia 2, Sepsis 2, Others 6 | Asphyxia 1, Sepsis 1, Others 4 | Others 6 | Others 6 | Asphyxia 1, Pneumonia 1 | 30 |
Oraiyur (PHC) | Asphyxia 2, Sepsis 1, Others 12 | Asphyxia 4, Others 7 | Asphyxia 3, Sepsis 1, Pneumonia 1, Others 7 | Asphyxia 1, Sepsis 1, Others 10 | Sepsis 1 Pneumonia 5, Others 8 | 64 |
Keel Arungunam (PHC) | 0 | Others 6 | Asphyxia 3, Others 3 | sepsis 1, Others 5 | Others 5 | 23 |
Nellikuppam (PHC) | Asphyxia 1, Sepsis 1, Others 5 | Sepsis 1, Others 3 | Asphyxia 2, sepsis 3, Others 3 | Others 2 | Others 7 | 28 |
Kadampuliyur (PHC) | Asphyxia 1, Others 12 | Asphyxia 4, Sepsis 3, Others 4 | Others 8 | Asphyxia 1, Sepsis 1, Others 4 | Asphyxia 2, Sepsis 1, Others 11 | 52 |
Marungur (PHC) | Asphyxia 1, Others 6 | Asphyxia 1, Sepsis 1, Others 5 | Asphyxia 1, Pneumonia 1, Others 4 | Pneumonia 1, Others 2 | Pneumonia 1, Others 2 | 26 |
Perperiyankuppam (PHC) | Asphyxia 3, Sepsis 3, Pneumonia 2 | Others 9 | Others 2 | Others 8 | Asphyxia 1, Others 4 | 31 |
Veeraperumalnallur (PHC) | Sepsis 2, Others 3 | Asphyxia 3, Sepsis 1, Pneumonia 1, Others 10 | Asphyxia 1, Others 6 | Asphyxia 1, Sepsis 3, Pneumonia 2, others 6 | Asphyxia 3, Others 2 | 44 |
Panruti (PHC) | Others 5 | Sepsis 1, Others 2 | Asphyxia 2, Sepsis 1, Pneumonia 1 | Others 2 | Others 1 | 15 |
Panruti (GH) | Nil | Nil | Nil | Others 1 | Others 1 | 2 |
Total | 77 | 78 | 61 | 61 | 60 | 337 |
Model | R | R Square | Adjusted R Square | Std. Error of the Estimate | Change Statistics | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R Square Change | F Change | df1 | df2 | Sig. F Change | |||||
1 | 0.112a | 0.012 | 0.007 | 3.51596 | 0.012 | 2.413 | 9 | 1719 | 0.010* |
a. Predictors: (Constant), Age, Age at marriage, Family’s Income, Occupation of pregnant women, Husband’s Occupation, Community, Educational Qualification of Women, Educational Qualification Husband, Type of house | |||||||||
b. Dependent Variable: Utilization of Antenatal Healthcare |
Variable | Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | Sig. | Collinearity Statistics | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Std. Error | Beta | Tolerance | VIF | ||||
(Constant) | 7.128 | 0.898 | 7.937 | 0.000 | ||||
X1 | Present age | 0.069 | 0.032 | 0.069 | 2.162 | 0.031* | 0.572 | 1.747 |
X2 | Age at marriage | -0.044 | 0.039 | -0.036 | -1.130 | 0.259 | 0.552 | 1.811 |
X3 | Family’s Income. | 0.003 | 0.070 | 0.001 | 0.038 | 0.970 | 0.920 | 1.087 |
X4 | Occupation of pregnant women | 0.019 | 0.032 | 0.015 | 0.586 | 0.558 | 0.831 | 1.203 |
X5 | Husband’s Occupation | 0.015 | 0.063 | 0.006 | 0.244 | 0.808 | 0.858 | 1.165 |
X6 | Community | -0.049 | 0.114 | -0.011 | -0.434 | 0.665 | 0.965 | 1.036 |
X7 | Educational Qualification of Women | 0.265 | 0.082 | 0.098 | 3.256 | 0.001** | 0.634 | 1.576 |
X8 | Educational Qualification Husband | -0.187 | 0.074 | -0.075 | -2.515 | 0.012* | 0.654 | 1.528 |
X9 | Type of house | -0.136 | 0.054 | -0.064 | -2.534 | 0.011* | 0.899 | 1.112 |
a. Dependent Variable: Utilization of Antenatal Healthcare |
Model | R | R Square | Adjusted R Square | Std. Error of the Estimate | Change Statistics | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R Square Change | F Change | df1 | df2 | Sig. F Change | |||||
1 | 0.164a | 0.027 | 0.023 | 4.069 | 0.027 | 6.814 | 7 | 1721 | 0.001** |
a. Predictors: (Constant), Was any baby died after birth? Family’s Annual Income., Which class does you belongs to? Have you had any miscarriage? What is your Educational Qualification? Your Occupation, Was any baby born dead before birth? |
Variable | Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | Sig. | Collinearity Statistics | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Std. Error | Beta | Tolerance | VIF | ||||
(Constant) | 7.615 | 1.048 | 7.265 | 0.000 | ||||
X1 | Family’s Annual Income. | 0.141 | 0.079 | 0.043 | 1.775 | 0.076 | 0.973 | 1.028 |
X2 | Occupation of pregnant women | 0.153 | 0.034 | 0.108 | 4.461 | 0.001** | 0.965 | 1.036 |
X3 | Which class do you belong to? | -0.299 | 0.131 | -0.055 | -2.290 | 0.022* | 0.978 | 1.022 |
X4 | Educational Qualification of pregnant women | -0.265 | 0.076 | -0.084 | -3.486 | 0.001** | 0.977 | 1.023 |
X5 | Have you had any miscarriage? | 0.908 | 0.309 | 0.071 | 2.943 | 0.003** | 0.979 | 1.021 |
X6 | Was any baby born dead before birth? | 0.636 | 0.711 | 0.023 | .895 | 0.371 | 0.882 | 1.134 |
X7 | Was any baby died after birth? | -0.994 | 0.643 | -0.039 | -1.545 | 0.123 | 0.894 | 1.119 |
Model | R | R Square | Adjusted R Square | Std. Error of the Estimate | Change Statistics | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R Square Change | F Change | df1 | df2 | Sig. F Change | |||||
1 | 0.148a | 0.022 | 0.016 | 0.318 | 0.022 | 3.824 | 10 | 1718 | 0.001 |
a. Predictors: (Constant), What is your Husband’s Educational Qualification?, Number of Family members, Which religion do you belong to?, Age, Family’s Annual Income., Your Occupation, Which class do you belong to?, Husband’s Occupation, What is your Educational Qualification?, How old were you at the time of marriage? |
Variable | Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | Sig. | Collinearity Statistics | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Std. Error | Beta | Tolerance | VIF | ||||
(Constant) | 0.948 | 0.117 | 8.088 | 0.000 | ||||
X1 | Present age | 0.014 | 0.003 | 0.156 | 4.942 | 0.001** | 0.572 | 1.747 |
X2 | Age at marriage | -0.016 | 0.004 | -0.150 | -4.667 | 0.001** | 0.552 | 1.810 |
X3 | Number of family members | -0.016 | 0.012 | -0.032 | -1.321 | 0.187 | 0.986 | 1.014 |
X4 | Family’s annual income. | -0.001 | 0.006 | -0.003 | -.140 | 0.889 | 0.923 | 1.084 |
X5 | Occupation of pregnant women | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.028 | 1.102 | 0.270 | 0.872 | 1.146 |
X6 | Husband’s occupation | -0.003 | 0.006 | -0.014 | -.549 | 0.583 | 0.849 | 1.178 |
X7 | Which religion do you belong to? | 0.024 | 0.023 | 0.026 | 1.038 | 0.300 | 0.926 | 1.080 |
X8 | Which class do you belong to? | 0.016 | 0.011 | 0.038 | 1.513 | 0.130 | 0.921 | 1.086 |
X9 | Educational qualification of pregnant women | 0.018 | 0.007 | 0.071 | 2.382 | 0.017* | 0.633 | 1.579 |
X10 | Husband’s educational qualification? | -0.005 | 0.007 | -0.022 | -.751 | 0.452 | 0.657 | 1.522 |
Model | R | R Square | Adjusted R Square | Std. Error of the Estimate | Change Statistics | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R Square Change | F Change | df1 | df2 | Sig. F Change | |||||
1 | 0.151a | 0.023 | 0.017 | 0.160 | 0.023 | 4.013 | 10 | 1718 | 0.001 |
a. Predictors: (Constant), What is your Husband’s Educational Qualification?, Number of Family members, Which religion do you belong to?, Age, Family’s Annual Income., Your Occupation, Which class do you belong to?, Husband’s Occupation, What is your Educational Qualification?, How old were you at the time of marriage? |
Variable | Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | Sig. | Collinearity Statistics | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Std. Error | Beta | Tolerance | VIF | ||||
(Constant) | 1.105 | 0.059 | 18.772 | 0.000 | ||||
X1 | Present age | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.119 | 3.781 | 0.001** | 0.572 | 1.747 |
X2 | Age at marriage | -0.009 | 0.002 | -0.166 | -5.182 | 0.001** | 0.552 | 1.810 |
X3 | Number of family members | -0.005 | 0.006 | -0.022 | -0.901 | 0.368 | 0.986 | 1.014 |
X4 | Family’s annual income. | -0.002 | 0.003 | -0.012 | -0.491 | 0.623 | 0.923 | 1.084 |
X5 | Occupation of pregnant women | -0.003 | 0.001 | -0.062 | -2.442 | 0.015* | 0.872 | 1.146 |
X6 | Husband’s occupation | 0.009 | 0.003 | 0.079 | 3.056 | 0.002** | 0.849 | 1.178 |
X7 | Which religion do you belong to? | -0.007 | 0.011 | -0.016 | -0.641 | 0.521 | 0.926 | 1.080 |
X8 | Which class do you belong to? | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.024 | 0.967 | 0.333 | 0.921 | 1.086 |
X9 | Educational qualification of pregnant women | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.035 | 1.168 | 0.243 | 0.633 | 1.579 |
X10 | Husband’s educational qualification? | -0.003 | 0.003 | -0.029 | -0.982 | 0.326 | 0.657 | 1.522 |
GH | General Hospital |
PHC | Primary Health Centre |
[1] | Fauveau, V., Koenig, M., Chakraborty, T., and Choudhury, A. (1988): Causes of maternal mortality in rural Bangladesh: 1978-1985. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 66(5), 643-651. |
[2] | Bhatia, J. C., and Cleland, J. (1993): Determinants of maternal care in a region of South India. Health Transition Review 5(2), 127-142. |
[3] | Ramachandran, L. (1989): The effect of antenatal and natal services on pregnancy outcome, and health of the mother and child. Journal of Family Welfare 35(5), 34-46. |
[4] | United Nations. (1994): Report of the International Conference on Population and Development A/CONF. 171/13. New York: United Nations. |
[5] | Phillips, J. F., Wayne, S., Bhatia, S., Rahman, M., and Chakraborty, J. (1998): The Demographic impact of the family planning-health services project in Matlab, Bangladesh. In J. R. Foreit and T. Frejka (Eds.), Family Planning Operations Research (pp. 83-102). New York: The Population Council. |
[6] | Obermeyer, C. M. (1991): Maternal health care utilization in Jordan: a study of patterns and determinants. Studies in Family Planning 22(3), 177-187. |
[7] | Stewart, K., and Sommerfelt, E. (1991): Utilization of maternal care Services: A comparative study using DHS data, Proceeding of the demographic and Health Surveys, World Conference, Washington. |
[8] | Elo, I. T. (1992): Utilization of maternal health-care services in Peru: the role of women’s education. Health Transition Review 2(1), 49- 69. |
[9] | Obermeyer, C. M. (1993): Maternal health care and women’s status: a comparison of Morocco and Tunisia. Studies in Family Planning 24(6), 354-365. |
[10] | Becker, S., David, H. P., Ronald, H. G., Connie, G., and Robert, E. B. (1993): The determinants of use of maternal and child health services in Metro Cebu, the Philippines. Health Transition Review 3(1), 77-89. |
[11] | Pebley, A. R., Goldman, N., and Rodriguez, G. (1996): Prenatal and delivery care and childhood immunization in Guatemala: Do family and community matter? Demography 33(2), 231-247. |
[12] | Raghupathy, S. (1996): Education and the use of maternal health care in Thailand. Social Science and Medicine 43(4), 459-471. |
[13] | Dharmalingam, A., Hussain, T. M., and Smith, J. F. (1999): Women’s Education, Autonomy and Utilization of Reproductive Health Services in Bangladesh, In A. I. Mundigo (Ed.), Reproductive Health: Programme and Policy Changes Post-Cairo. Liege, Belgium: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP). |
[14] | Addai, I. (2000): Determinants of use of maternal child health services in rural Ghana, Journal of BioSocial Sciences 32, 1-15. |
[15] | Acharya, L. B., and Cleland, J. (2000): Maternal and child health services in rural Nepal: does access or quality matter more? Health Policy and Planning 15(2), 223-229. |
[16] | Abosse Z, Woldie M, Ololo S (2010): Factors influencing antenatal care service utilization in Hadiya zone. Ethiop J Health Sci. 20. |
[17] | Perumal N, Cole DC, Ouédraogo HZ, et al (2013): Health and nutrition knowledge, attitudes and practices of pregnant women attending and not-attending ANC clinics in Western Kenya: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Preg Childbirth. 13: 1. |
[18] | Kisuule I, Kaye DK, Najjuka F, et al. (2013): Timing and reasons for coming late for the first antenatal care visit by pregnant women at Mulago hospital, Kampala Uganda. BMC Preg Childbirth. 13: 1. |
[19] | WHO Global Health Observatory (2011): Antenatal care situations and trends. |
[20] | Finlayson K, Downe S. (2013): Why do women not use antenatal services in low-and-middle-income countries? A Meta synthesis of qualitative studies. PLoS Med; 10: e1001373. |
[21] | Women's NCC, Health Cs. Antenatal care. 2016. |
[22] | Pell C, Menaca A, Were F, et al (2013): Factors affecting antenatal care attendance: results from qualitative studies in Ghana, Kenya, and Malawi. PloS one. 8: e53747. |
[23] | Bauserman M, Lokangaka A, Thorsten V, et al (2015): Risk factors for maternal death and trends in maternal mortality in low and middle-income countries: a prospective longitudinal cohort analysis. Reprod Health. 12(2). |
[24] | Carroli G, Rooney C, Villar J. (2001): How effective is antenatal care in preventing maternal mortality and serious morbidity? An overview of the evidence. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 15: 1-42. |
APA Style
Sivalingam, V., Govindarajan, B., Karuppaiyan, S., Ayyanar, M. (2025). Multiple Regression Analysis: Utilization of Antenatal Care and Its Impact on Maternal and Infant Health in Panruti Taluk, Tamil Nadu, India. Social Sciences, 14(4), 459-472. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251404.27
ACS Style
Sivalingam, V.; Govindarajan, B.; Karuppaiyan, S.; Ayyanar, M. Multiple Regression Analysis: Utilization of Antenatal Care and Its Impact on Maternal and Infant Health in Panruti Taluk, Tamil Nadu, India. Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(4), 459-472. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20251404.27
@article{10.11648/j.ss.20251404.27, author = {Vadivel Sivalingam and Balachandar Govindarajan and Sankar Karuppaiyan and Mayakannan Ayyanar}, title = {Multiple Regression Analysis: Utilization of Antenatal Care and Its Impact on Maternal and Infant Health in Panruti Taluk, Tamil Nadu, India }, journal = {Social Sciences}, volume = {14}, number = {4}, pages = {459-472}, doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20251404.27}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251404.27}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20251404.27}, abstract = {Introduction: This study investigates the Utilisation of antenatal care and its impact on maternal and infant health in Panruti Taluk, Tamil Nadu, India, from 2013 to 2017. Antenatal care is essential for monitoring pregnancy, detecting complications, and providing necessary health advice and preventive care. Aim and Objective: To investigate the pattern of antenatal registration, childbirth and death and causes of infant death in the General Hospital and Primary Health Centres of Panruti taluk, Tamil Nadu, India. Methodology: The primary data (questionnaire schedule) was distributed to the pregnant women for health check-ups falling in the age group of 15 to 38 years who came to one government hospitals (229) and 10 primary health centres (10X150=1500), totally (229+1500) 1729 samples were collected by scientifically tested random sampling procedure from this taluk and they were the respondents of this study. This data was entered into SPSS software, and Regression analysis was performed for the interpretation of this study. Findings: The findings highlight the importance of educational qualifications, present age, and types of houses in predicting antenatal care utilisation. Additionally, the study examines the relationship between haemoglobin levels and socio-economic conditions, miscarriage, and infant deaths. Results: The results show that occupation, educational qualifications, and community are associated with haemoglobin levels, while miscarriage is influenced by present age, age at marriage, and educational qualifications. Conclusion: The study concludes that socio-economic and demographic factors play a crucial role in maternal and infant health, haemoglobin levels, miscarriage rates, and infant deaths in Panruti Taluk.}, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Multiple Regression Analysis: Utilization of Antenatal Care and Its Impact on Maternal and Infant Health in Panruti Taluk, Tamil Nadu, India AU - Vadivel Sivalingam AU - Balachandar Govindarajan AU - Sankar Karuppaiyan AU - Mayakannan Ayyanar Y1 - 2025/08/25 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251404.27 DO - 10.11648/j.ss.20251404.27 T2 - Social Sciences JF - Social Sciences JO - Social Sciences SP - 459 EP - 472 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-988X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251404.27 AB - Introduction: This study investigates the Utilisation of antenatal care and its impact on maternal and infant health in Panruti Taluk, Tamil Nadu, India, from 2013 to 2017. Antenatal care is essential for monitoring pregnancy, detecting complications, and providing necessary health advice and preventive care. Aim and Objective: To investigate the pattern of antenatal registration, childbirth and death and causes of infant death in the General Hospital and Primary Health Centres of Panruti taluk, Tamil Nadu, India. Methodology: The primary data (questionnaire schedule) was distributed to the pregnant women for health check-ups falling in the age group of 15 to 38 years who came to one government hospitals (229) and 10 primary health centres (10X150=1500), totally (229+1500) 1729 samples were collected by scientifically tested random sampling procedure from this taluk and they were the respondents of this study. This data was entered into SPSS software, and Regression analysis was performed for the interpretation of this study. Findings: The findings highlight the importance of educational qualifications, present age, and types of houses in predicting antenatal care utilisation. Additionally, the study examines the relationship between haemoglobin levels and socio-economic conditions, miscarriage, and infant deaths. Results: The results show that occupation, educational qualifications, and community are associated with haemoglobin levels, while miscarriage is influenced by present age, age at marriage, and educational qualifications. Conclusion: The study concludes that socio-economic and demographic factors play a crucial role in maternal and infant health, haemoglobin levels, miscarriage rates, and infant deaths in Panruti Taluk. VL - 14 IS - 4 ER -